<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Hindsight Factor</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thehindsightfactor.com/another_innocent_shopper_arrested_for_refusing_to_show_their_rec"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thehindsightfactor.com/node/911/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.thehindsightfactor.com/node/911/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-09-03T07:37:49-07:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Another innocent shopper arrested for refusing to show their receipt</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thehindsightfactor.com/another_innocent_shopper_arrested_for_refusing_to_show_their_rec" />
    <id>http://www.thehindsightfactor.com/another_innocent_shopper_arrested_for_refusing_to_show_their_rec</id>
    <published>2007-09-03T07:20:30-07:00</published>
    <updated>2007-09-03T07:37:49-07:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Jay Daverth</name>
    </author>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This raised my ire a bit last week, but in the grand scheme of things, there seemed more worthy issues to discuss than some poor <a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/civil-rights/tigerdirect-unlawfully-restrains-and-verbally-abuses-customer-for-not-submitting-to-receipt+showing-demands-292688.php">lady who was unlawfully detained and verbally abused by TigerDirect</a>.&nbsp; Yet,&nbsp;with <a href="http://www.michaelrighi.com/2007/09/01/arrested-at-circuit-city/">yet another incident</a> occurring within the same week - this time at a Circuit City in Ohio, I can hold my tongue no longer.&nbsp; Like shoes at the airport, the increasingly common practice of public retail outlets demanding receipts at the door is a pet annoyance of mine.</p> <p>&nbsp;Of course, anyone who shops at one of the so-called 'wholesale' outlets has long been accustomed to the practice.&nbsp; <img height="350" src="http://businessbloggingtips.com/images/45255-41244/stealing.jpg" width="258" align="left" />After all, such warehouses are members-only and, as part of your membership, you <a href="http://www.samsclub.com/shopping/navigate.do?catg=5352">explicitly and contractually agree to this kind of treatment</a>.&nbsp; I have made no such agreements with Best Buy, CompUSA, TigerDirect, or any other public retail outlet and on that basis routinely decline to show my receipt at the exit.</p> <p>There is an <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/09/01/papers-please-arrest.html#comment-4126">interesting discussion</a> happening on this right now over at BoingBoing.&nbsp; People seem to be coming down on both sides of the issue, including <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/09/01/papers-please-arrest.html#comment-4409">an attorney</a>&nbsp;who seems to feel that stores have the right to ask.&nbsp; On this, I am not in dispute - anyone has the right to guard against loss.&nbsp;&nbsp;But in no way does this right extend to the power of arrest.&nbsp; As far as I - and I believe the law - is concerned, the moment you exchange money for goods, those goods legally belong to you and your business has concluded.&nbsp; Just because some corporate automaton in a cheap security costume asks to see your receipt does not mean that you are under even the slightest legal obligation to do so.&nbsp; If they have reasonable suspicion that you have shoplifted, then they are welcome to contact the authorities.</p> <p>In the larger sense,&nbsp;the reason such outlets are resorting to these methods is a side-effect of a much larger problem in corporate America.&nbsp; As someone who worked many formative years in retail,&nbsp;I can attest first-hand that large retail outlets train employees on the principle that the only defense against shoplifting is good customer service.&nbsp; It's hard to shove an ipod down your pants when there are employees everywhere trying to make themselves helpful.&nbsp; But given the ubiquitous crisis that CEO's might make a few million less than their golf buddies, such chains are chronically understaffed.&nbsp; Which increases shoplifting.&nbsp; Which is why we all have to deal with this nonsense.</p> <p>Surely I'm not the only one annoyed by this new trend.&nbsp; So how 'bout it?&nbsp; Stop acting like a sheep and&nbsp;start exercising your legal right to decline.&nbsp; There is no reason to be anything but polite about it - trust me, the dude making 8 bucks and hour is not really going to care unless you get rude with him.&nbsp; But be firm.&nbsp; Explain your position and keep right on walking.&nbsp; And don't sweat it - they know that putting their hands <img src="http://www.littleblackdressbooks.com/images/tn11.jpg" align="right" /> on you is against the law and 99.9% of the time have already been instructed by management not to interfere.&nbsp; If you're really concerned,&nbsp;try carrying one of <a href="http://alex.halavais.net/you-may-not-see-my-receipt/">these</a> in your wallet:</p> <blockquote> <p>To the General Manager:  </p><p>I have handed this paper to your security employee who has requested to see my receipt following a purchase, a request I politely refused. I recognize that this employee is doing the job you have assigned, and this should not be seen as an indication that this person has done anything but a fine job.  </p><p>However, I am insulted by your practice of treating every customer as a potential thief. Note that this lack of goodwill results not only in my future choice of other, more customer-oriented stores over your own, it also results in significant negative word-of-mouth advertising regarding my shopping experience. Consider that you will have to spend substantial amounts of revenue in advertising for new customers with each customer you lose to this charade.  </p><p>I sincerely hope you will reconsider your policy of checking receipts at the door. I recognize that shoplifting and other forms of loss are a challenge to retail establishments, and I encourage you to take measures?including increasing the number and training of sales associates?to reduce loss. Insulting your customers is the wrong approach.</p></blockquote>    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This raised my ire a bit last week, but in the grand scheme of things, there seemed more worthy issues to discuss than some poor <a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/civil-rights/tigerdirect-unlawfully-restrains-and-verbally-abuses-customer-for-not-submitting-to-receipt+showing-demands-292688.php">lady who was unlawfully detained and verbally abused by TigerDirect</a>.&nbsp; Yet,&nbsp;with <a href="http://www.michaelrighi.com/2007/09/01/arrested-at-circuit-city/">yet another incident</a> occurring within the same week - this time at a Circuit City in Ohio, I can hold my tongue no longer.&nbsp; Like shoes at the airport, the increasingly common practice of public retail outlets demanding receipts at the door is a pet annoyance of mine.</p> <p>&nbsp;Of course, anyone who shops at one of the so-called 'wholesale' outlets has long been accustomed to the practice.&nbsp; <img height="350" src="http://businessbloggingtips.com/images/45255-41244/stealing.jpg" width="258" align="left" />After all, such warehouses are members-only and, as part of your membership, you <a href="http://www.samsclub.com/shopping/navigate.do?catg=5352">explicitly and contractually agree to this kind of treatment</a>.&nbsp; I have made no such agreements with Best Buy, CompUSA, TigerDirect, or any other public retail outlet and on that basis routinely decline to show my receipt at the exit.</p> <p>There is an <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/09/01/papers-please-arrest.html#comment-4126">interesting discussion</a> happening on this right now over at BoingBoing.&nbsp; People seem to be coming down on both sides of the issue, including <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/09/01/papers-please-arrest.html#comment-4409">an attorney</a>&nbsp;who seems to feel that stores have the right to ask.&nbsp; On this, I am not in dispute - anyone has the right to guard against loss.&nbsp;&nbsp;But in no way does this right extend to the power of arrest.&nbsp; As far as I - and I believe the law - is concerned, the moment you exchange money for goods, those goods legally belong to you and your business has concluded.&nbsp; Just because some corporate automaton in a cheap security costume asks to see your receipt does not mean that you are under even the slightest legal obligation to do so.&nbsp; If they have reasonable suspicion that you have shoplifted, then they are welcome to contact the authorities.</p> <p>In the larger sense,&nbsp;the reason such outlets are resorting to these methods is a side-effect of a much larger problem in corporate America.&nbsp; As someone who worked many formative years in retail,&nbsp;I can attest first-hand that large retail outlets train employees on the principle that the only defense against shoplifting is good customer service.&nbsp; It's hard to shove an ipod down your pants when there are employees everywhere trying to make themselves helpful.&nbsp; But given the ubiquitous crisis that CEO's might make a few million less than their golf buddies, such chains are chronically understaffed.&nbsp; Which increases shoplifting.&nbsp; Which is why we all have to deal with this nonsense.</p> <p>Surely I'm not the only one annoyed by this new trend.&nbsp; So how 'bout it?&nbsp; Stop acting like a sheep and&nbsp;start exercising your legal right to decline.&nbsp; There is no reason to be anything but polite about it - trust me, the dude making 8 bucks and hour is not really going to care unless you get rude with him.&nbsp; But be firm.&nbsp; Explain your position and keep right on walking.&nbsp; And don't sweat it - they know that putting their hands <img src="http://www.littleblackdressbooks.com/images/tn11.jpg" align="right" /> on you is against the law and 99.9% of the time have already been instructed by management not to interfere.&nbsp; If you're really concerned,&nbsp;try carrying one of <a href="http://alex.halavais.net/you-may-not-see-my-receipt/">these</a> in your wallet:</p> <blockquote> <p>To the General Manager:  </p><p>I have handed this paper to your security employee who has requested to see my receipt following a purchase, a request I politely refused. I recognize that this employee is doing the job you have assigned, and this should not be seen as an indication that this person has done anything but a fine job.  </p><p>However, I am insulted by your practice of treating every customer as a potential thief. Note that this lack of goodwill results not only in my future choice of other, more customer-oriented stores over your own, it also results in significant negative word-of-mouth advertising regarding my shopping experience. Consider that you will have to spend substantial amounts of revenue in advertising for new customers with each customer you lose to this charade.  </p><p>I sincerely hope you will reconsider your policy of checking receipts at the door. I recognize that shoplifting and other forms of loss are a challenge to retail establishments, and I encourage you to take measures?including increasing the number and training of sales associates?to reduce loss. Insulting your customers is the wrong approach.</p></blockquote>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
